The current issue of the Ballet Magazine is dedicated to its 25th
anniversary. Its first and main column is titled Gala Ballet. Here the
members of the editorial board present themselves, both as writers and
personae of the publications.
In anniversary number many photos of press photographers of magazine
are submitted. Alexander Kosintsa's photo
Galina Ulanova and the ballerina Nadegda Gracheva.
– The first one is called The Author of Fern is a Moscovite. “Those
who joined together to stage the ballet Fern, or, Midsummer Night belonged
to the social circles of Moscow intelligentsia with markedly patriotic
views. The libretto was composed in the house of V. P. Begichev, then Repertoire
Supervisor of the Imperial Theaters’ Moscow office and later, in 1875,
a coauthor of the libretto for Swan Lake. This time, however, his wife,
M. V. Shilovskaya, formerly a singer, took a most active part in composing
the ballet.” Yu. G. Gerber, violinist and then conductor of the Bolshoy
Theater’s orchestra, composed the music. Fern, the first original creation
of Gerber as a composer, “proved him an experienced and skillful musician.”
The writer of this research article describes in detail the plot of this
old-time ballet and relates of its first premiere performance at the Bolshoy
Theater.
– Vitaly Wulf, in his usual unhurried manner, tells a story of Elizabeth
Gerdt, a star of the Moscow ballet scene, who had excelled in preserving
in her best roles all noble and sublime perfection of classical ballet.
“Being a lordly Myrta, queen of the Wilis, rather than a poetical Giselle,
or a magnificent Fairy of Lilacs or a resplendent Raymonda rather than
a tender Aurora, her stagecraft may not, perhaps, had been keen on personal
overtones, but it had always been faultless.” Expressiveness of her sonorous,
faultless, chiseled style that matched music in its resonant power was
polished by Ms. Gerdt to the uttermost condition. George Balanchine regarded
her as a role model of classical ballerina. He liked to recall her dance
and believed that Raymonda and The Sleeping Beauty were staged with her
talents specifically in mind. Her dance was never arduous – it was art
supreme. She was also a great instructor who had trained a whole constellation
of the 20th century Russian ballet stars. “She used to come to the theater
every time her students performed, and the theater used to send a car to
bring her over for classes. Yuri Grigorovich was very fond of her and regarded
her as ‘a dear fragment of the past’.”
– Alexey Barchatov in his poetical essay declares his love of ballet
and Terpsichore its Muse. “What is it, then, that I love ballet for? Perhaps,
it is for its unique and universal ability to visibly embody the very nature
of human inspiration in which both process and result fuse together and
become one. Choreography encompasses both the musical spindle of the conductor’s
baton and the graceful brush of the painter who has no idea of port de
bras or pr?paration.” … “My today’s love of ballet is in many ways also
a nostalgia for classical purity and beauty of art, for traditions and
canon, for talent and true stagecraft. … Such are instinctive stirs of
those hearts for whom the Mariinsky and Bolshoy theaters are more than
just a brand.”
– From Soviet Ballet to Ballet Per Se is an article by Galina Beliaeva-Tchelombitko.
She recalls the events of 25 years ago when the magazine then called The
Soviet Ballet was created, whose main newsbeat and topic were domestic
choreography all over the vast artistic domains of the Union and Autonomous
Republics of the USSR. “This is not to say that the life of foreign ballet
was not covered by the periodical. But in the reviews of different guest
performers from abroad and in the descriptions of different foreign stars
one could never perceive even a hint of our inferiority, which today is
so shocking in publications by our contemporary so called ‘ballet critics’.
We always stayed up to the notch; we felt self-sufficient and were sure
of our internal artistic truth.”
Musing over her past editorial experience, she recalls how the small
townhouse in Degtiarny Lane was home to almost daily spontaneous gatherings
of artists, critics, and choreographers, both Muscovites and out-of-towners.
“Those times are gone forever. People’s lives have changed, and so has
the ballet theater and those who minister to it and those who love it.”
– There is hardly a major ballet company in the world where Boris
Akimov has not worked. Yelena Fedorenko presents here his interview. His
disciples love their mentor; his classes prepare them for new achievements
and cure their sorrows and teach them to hear music and to understand the
nature of motion. Boris Akimov’s life has been like the twists of a roller-coaster.
Principal dancer for the Bolshoy Theater and a world-renowned ballet instructor,
he has also experienced the burden of being a manager, having headed the
Moscow Choreography Academy and the Bolshoy Ballet troupe. Boris Borisovich
Akimov celebrated his double anniversary on the New Stage of the Bolshoy
Theater. In the interview, he tells of how the celebration night, which
astounded balletomanes, was prepared and reveals some secrets of its success;
he also recalls his early days as an instructor, as well as his meetings
in London with those who knew the legendary Russian choreographers Miasin
and Diaghilev. Mr. Akimov’s activities as a composer, a vocation rather
rare for a ballet artist, made up yet another subject of the conversation.
– In his ironic article A Treatise on Wrongs of Reform in General
Sergey Korobkov recalls the birth of the Ballet Magazine’s The Soul of
Dance Award in the context of the award craze that then affected our flighty
Motherland. “In that ever expanding march of awards there peeped out something
vane, something at times quite devoid of both honor and dignity, and all
that had little to do with the timeless, with that which needs neither
insignia nor being distinguished by the title of “Professional.”
It turns out that The Soul of Dance was made up according to a completely
different
recipe resembling no other award. At the very outset it was announced that
the Reward was to be “our own’, domestic as it were, in its intonation,
in its spirit, in its attitude towards those who were to receive it. Who
needed rivalry, anyway? The main goal was to revive the visibly dwindled
(and they knew the reasons for it) interest for the art of ballet. The
name of the award seemed obliging; I rather liked it despite its being
a bit bombastic; it seemed the only one perfectly fitting ballet, out of
which she, the Soul, even then, in the early 90’s, was already draining
away, and her departure seemed the main reason why that interest was falling.
It would have been a shame not to fight for it, not to try and bring it
back.” The writer goes on to share his personal impressions on how he himself
happened to deliver the awards to the legendary General Manager of the
Perm’ Opera and Ballet Theater, Mikhail Arnopolsky; how he was forced to
play upon the absence of Yuri Grigorovich at the award ceremony; how the
Magazine, when choosing the winners in different nominations, has managed
not to mess up the “star chart of the world ballet”.
– Natalia Levkoyeva in her article The Classical in a Virtual Space
writes about the world competition movement in the domain of ballet. “Competition
in sports is natural and appropriate, but what about contests in arts?
There is no quite an unambiguous answer.” Still, ballet artists have flocked
together for competitions for almost half a century now. Precision of choreographic
language has been one of the problems in the competition programs, and
the writer describes the assistance the enthusiasts from the Theatrical
Union’s Dance Recording Laboratory had given to competitors and ballet
artists in general. They had recorded 30 classical variations from the
ballets by Russian choreographers using a descriptive form of recording
which is easier for understanding than the traditional symbolic one. Today’s
state-of-the-art computer technologies make it possible to preserve all
details of the human body’s motion in three-dimensional format and thus
open new and enticing possibilities for preserving the classical heritage
in ballet.
– In his article The Multi-Cultural Context of Contemporary Choreography,
Valery Modestov reminds the reader that ballet is a European invention.
Since the early 20th century, however, it has expanded far beyond the boundaries
of the Old World and widened the frameworks of musical and plastic cultures
of China, Korea, Japan, Egypt, India, and Latin America. Representatives
of the Russian ballet school have helped promote a spiritual “convergence
of West and East”. This process has been significantly assisted by international
exchanges, migration processes and the limitless possibilities presented
by the contemporary means of communication and access to information. Here,
however, a number of problems arise, and the writer refers to them as
ones to watch and seek solutions for. Among those are a preservation of
style; staging of new contemporary ballets on foreign stages; fusion and
co-existence of the two ethno-cultures – the Oriental one, which the ballet
dancers have, as it were, sucked with their mothers’ milk, and the Occidental
one, which they have acquired during years of training. The article ends
with a reminder of the imperative of acquiring new knowledge and developing
new approaches and new training programs in the new socio-cultural situation.
– Arkady Sokolov-Kaminsky informs the readers of a third edition
of the dance instructor’s handbook An ABC of Classical Dance, released
by the Lan’ publishing house. The book’s co-authors, V. P. Mey and N. P.
Bazarova, present their views on how children should be trained during
the first three years. This edition was radically revised by V. P. Mey
after her co-author’s death and is in essence a new work. A. Ya. Vaganova
Academy of Russian Ballet cordially hosted the book’s presentation. Mr.
Sokolov-Kaminsky, who had a lot to do with the event, recreates here a
portrait of the talented instructor – obsessive and strict yet infinitely
loved by her students. Recalling his encounters with Varvara Pavlovna Mey
he presents a life story of this great teacher and dance analyst and, undoubtedly,
an artist in heart.
– Victor Vanslov in his sketch The Paradigm of the Time not only
declares but also proves that the 20th century’s Russian ballet in its
best examples has always been profoundly purposeful. “Its purport has changed
during different periods and in different, often rivaling, streams and
movements, but the best ballet productions have captured one, not only
with their perfection and stagecraft, but also with their great spiritual
potential, sublime ideas and philosophical contemplations of life. The
contemporary ballet, of course, upholds and further develops this tradition.”
At the same time, the writer is apprehensive of the fact that “the art
of choreography shallows down, that mere skill at times takes over true
creative art and the technical aspect sometimes replaces the spiritual.”
We must discern and understand this dangerous trend; we must realize that
it is no path to true pinnacles of the art.
– Julia Mikhailovna Churko, a distinguished scholar in the art of
choreography, is renowned for her fundamental research works in ballet
studies. But she also writes fiction. Here the author, who has dedicated
her life to the art of dance, is again immersed in its events, its concerns,
and its struggles. Her third book of that sort, The Parallel Lives, was
recently published and is announced by herself in this issue.
– The Grishko Company manufactures shoes, clothes and accessories
for ballet and dance. Nikolai Grishko, the Company president and a member
of the Magazine’s editorial board, opened in 1989 a small shop producing
ballet shoes. Today the company has two shoe factories, a costumery shop,
several shops for tailoring rehearsal and training attire, and many retail
outlets all over the world. Its products are targeted not only at professional
dancers but also at children and teenagers who train or just dabble in
dance. Nikolai Grishko has won many rewards as one of the most famous patrons
of the arts in Russia. As such, his main goal is not only to support young
talents and help old stagers but also to promote the development of healthy
and aesthetically advanced generation of children and teens. That is why
the Grishko Company hands out monthly personal stipends to different ballet
school students. Another charitable activity of the Company is co-sponsoring
of international ballet competitions and providing outfits for the young
contestants.
– Irina Belova in her article The Legend of Krasnodar enthusiastically
describes the Yuri Grigorovich’s Ballet Theater of Krasnodar. The new theater
was conceived by Leonard Gatov, a man of fabulous energy and amazing sense
of responsibility, leader of the Premiere Classical Dance Ensemble, on
whose base the Theater was created ten years ago. In the course of these
ten years the Grigorovich Theater has established itself as an acclaimed
artistic company and traveled half the world. “The association of the very
parson of Yuri Nikolaevich with the city’s cultural life has by itself
promoted Krasnodar to the status of a cultural metropolis of, at least,
Southern Russia.” Back in 1996, Yuri Nikolaevich vowed to the Krasnodar
Province (Kray) that he would recreate there all eighteen ballets he had
staged while heading the Bolshoy Ballet. This past summer saw a seventeenth
premiere – that of the fabled Legend of Love. With it, the Krasnodar Theater
has become a veritable museum of the ballet masterpieces by Yuri Grigorovich
and his irreplaceable collaborator, the late stage designer Virsaladze.
– Galina Mitroshina and Christina Handlos’s article LURIT: Music
for Festivities deals with a most important aspect of histrionics – stage
design of a ballet production. “This task is difficult but exciting. Success
or failure of a production largely depends on how professionally this task
is being performed. The LURIT Artistic Fellowship has honestly earned a
good name in this field.” “The company headed by Vladimir Koval acts according
to the motto, All are responsible for everything. LURIT is indeed responsible
literally for everything around the action on stage – for audio setup and
for highlight, for all kinds of special effects and for fireworks. Trained
as a music conductor, Mr. Koval quite professionally combines pyrotechnics
with music, thus creating colorful spectacular. The resplendent rain that
annually showers over the winners of the Ballet Magazine’s Soul of Dance
award long remains imprinted in the audiences’ memories as the crown of
the event, thanks to our friends from the LURIT Artistic Fellowship.”
– Tamara Putova in her article When the Heart So Desires reports
on the centennial celebrations of the great choreographer of our times
Igor Moiseyev, which coincided with two other significant anniversaries
– 70 years since the opening in Moscow of the Folk Arts Theater and since
the All-Union Folk Dance Festival. “These two events served as one of the
starting points for creating numerous folk dance companies, both professional
and amateur, and formulated basic principles of the treatment and stylizing
of folk dance.” While recounting the first steps of folk dance’s theatrical
interpretation, the writer quotes Igor Moiseyev himself. “It is practical
and specific tasks at hand that motivate us to study folk dance,” he wrote.
“We must learn from these dances; they must provide content for the Soviet
ballets of the time to come, which will reflect our Soviet reality, everyday
life, history, and epos of different peoples of our diverse Republics.”
– The Magazine has received birthday greetings from the actor Feodor
Chekhankov and General Manager of the State Theater of Nations Mikhail
Chigir. “By the time the Theater of Nations was created, your magazine
already had known how to do it all, had already been acknowledged, and
had a lot to learn from. Which is exactly what we have done. We have asked
its guidance when encountering the need to look for new forms of representing
the repertoire. We are proud of it, just as we are proud to call the Ballet
Magazine our true friend, and its creators, true friends of our Theater”,
Mr. Chigir writes.
– Alla Mikhaleva presents a review Bejart, a Chosen One of God,
sharing her impressions of Bejart Ballet Lausanne’s program Selecta. The
great choreographer’s troupe has shown in Moscow three ballets never before
seen by the Russian audiences, as well as a piece of Bejart’s classic,
Adagietto to the music of Gustav Mahler. The main character in the ballet
The Art of Being a Grandfather turns out to be the choreographer himself,
or rather his alter ego. Uneasy relationships between the teacher and his
disciples, further complicated by differences in age, define the confrontation
between choreographer and dancer. Can it Be Death? is the centerpiece of
the Bejartians’ Moscow visit. In its classical drive, this 1970 production
has not been outdated a jot. It was staged for one male dancer and four
female partners… They entwist with him in duets; they make up trios like
the Botticellian Graces… In the final show of the program, Vienna, Vienna,
a volatile waltz (the first thing coming to mind at the mention of that
city) gets cut short by a ragged plastic in a deafening muteness… Carelessness
and anxiety, love and hatred, life and death all are encompassed by this
“select” program.”
– The Idols of the Ballet column collects diverse statement by the
famous critics whose names are associated with the Magazine’s early years.
Nikolai Eliash wrote much about the multi-ethnical nature of the Soviet
ballet, for example, “Had it not been for the flourish of ethnic cultures,
the achievements of the Soviet ballet as a whole would have been impossible,
just as the art of choreography in our brother Republics would not have
been able to fruitfully develop had it not leaned on its international
experience.”
Out of the multitude of Natalia Chernova’s articles, a piece of
her reflections upon ballet canvasses of Marius Petipa is presented here.
“He was a genius of theater and a zealot, while theater, in turn, was his
life, his mode of existence. Petipa was a grand professional of the ballet
stage, its true artisan in the very sublime sense of the word.”
Out of the vast heritage of Vera Karsovskaya, fragments of her Shakespearian
studies have been selected here. “Ballet has long, and ever move aggressively,
been discovering Shakespeare for itself and in its own manner. The reason
for that is, perhaps, that the heroes of strong individuality, untainted
passions and bottomless doubts that torture the Shakespearean characters
are just what ballet needs. The large scale, and at time whimsicality,
of Shakespearean actions and situations, the grandiosity of his metaphor
are akin to the very nature of ballet. All that spurs up the imagination
of those who embody tragedies and comedies in body motion. Never presuming
to highlight the Shakespearian palette in its entirety, choreographers
reach for the romantic element, which is so strong in his multidimensional
creations. For, indeed, such interest has been inherent in ballet since
day one.”
Boris Lvov-Anokhin, arguing from various incidents in the life of
Galina Ulanova, reflects upon such notions as Fate and Greatness. “A humble
person as she was, Ulanova used to ascribe the exceptionality of her fate
to a kind of chain of lucky chances. But chance was certainly not the essence
of it. The reason why Ulanova is regarded as a supreme ballerina is because
much of what she did and contributed to the art was done for the first
time indeed. As a matter of fact, it is those who discover something new
that are considered great.”
– The Debuts in the Ballet column presents three materials
prepared by young novice authors. The Ballet Magazine, it is worth noticing,
has always supported those who were only beginning their “life in arts”
(quoting Stanislavsky).
Marianna Yachmenyova presents an interview with Denis Matvienko,
Grand Prix winner at the Moscow International Competition of Ballet Dancers
and Choreographers. Today he is one of the most sought after young
artists. He carries on dancing on his home stage in Kiev Opera, much and
successfully performs at the Bolshoy Theater and is a most welcome participant
at all festivals.
The dancer talks about his work with Yuri Grigorovich and about
the importance of partnership in ballet; he recalls his early years in
ballet, his instructors, and his favorite role in the ballet Spartacus.
Anastasia Smirnova’s sketch is dedicated to Nikolai Sergeev. “This
man’s name, very little known in his native land, had for a long time been
a household name for theatergoers in the West. It was he who, in the 1920’s,
introduces Petipa’s best classical ballets to Europe. Sergeev died in 1951,
but even now, more than half a century later, there is no common agreement
concerning the true significance of his work.” In 1917, after the Bolshevik
revolution, being a rampant Monarchist and a disciplinarian who hated chaos
and devastation, chose to emigrate. There began a new stage of his life,
much more glorious than the previous one. He managed to take along to London,
which became his new home, autographed records of the most important ballets
that had been shown on stage of St. Petersburg between 1900 and 1917, mainly
by Petipa. Using those he had staged the Russian classical ballets in the
West.
Olga Goncharova in her article The Universe as a Gift analyzes in
detail the ballet Cinderella staged at the Bolshoy Theater by choreographer
Yuri Posokhov and stage director Yuri Borisov.
The writer bases the concept of her article on the fact that “there
are plots in the world culture that migrate from age to age, pop up here
and there, at times change beyond recognition, invade all possible genres,
and yet stay live and exciting. That is why producers of such ballets as
Cinderella, Romeo and Juliet etc. always have a notorious head start. The
Bolshoy Theater showed in 2006 yet another version of a ‘tale eternal’.”
It is that version that the young critic reviews here.
In anniversary number many photos of press photographers of magazine
are submitted.
Among them Elena Fetisovoj's work:
Ekaterina Maksimova on the anniversary evening.
|